On 22 January 2018 at 19:11, R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[..]
and very curiously as to 'strace' in your list, of course
there ** is no **
'0%{?centos} >= 8
nor a released rhel at that number either ;)
First possible explanation is that here it is some kind of mistake ("s*t happens .. sometimes" 😀).
Other people already mention that CentOS is using own git so theoretically only by this it should be no CentOS %ifings.
Simple I don't see any reason to introduce %{centos} as CentOS must be by definition free RHEL deriv.
Logic says that only %{rhel} or even better %{el6}, %{el7} (and so on) should be in use.
As long as we are talking not few hundreds but only few specs it will be not a big deal to *verify* all left specs "manually" .. one by one (even contacting with people which made exact commits).
If you want to take care of this small part .. feel free 😀
I'll have one point less on my ToDo list 😋
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
