-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 13:51 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:37:09PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Within Fedora, those conditionals are not happening that often.. But > > I would really love to see better separation of Fedora and EPEL. > > Because EPEL **slows down improvements of Fedora**. > > As you know, I want to go the other way. I want to bring Fedora > improvements to Fedora packages built for EL _more quickly_. That may > not be possible with EL7 and certainly not with EL6, but let's not > close ourselves off from a better future. That would be nice, but what to do with el6/el7 which will be supported for next N years? It is definitely not possible to get any RPM features (to my knowledge) in there because it is system-critical component and there is no even DNF (YUM doesn't work with rich dependencies). - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpi9PMACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0ynvg/+IHjhK7ivWwSaow9296hiPIKR/1VD61Jhbif2JbheyJI4Io1N1HCInAbt mCb5iBwvsPY+Evut/B3dYqHQR+HiC6GezUGOWvfayExGCY+bB2tx+Y8Cl4tXYVm6 xISYVo9rA3yKxJ0JrI+y0J2P8w4GHZgVRyF/1fgWYQlJJtJJyGS2WcRDxxTLNKBZ Qp9DNqG2Bi7uxaQlKOgnVC3Yr7eUIREKPytuhaJbLD7oxID4pPgsm6LHvw1r9Bqj OO4ya+jCnJaWq48dv9Q3/qmJrj0Omm5E9XgbueT4QNoaExCKNZnBzmwxOv7E9WNF bgiCIoUwPOF1TPT830t/9iBH+I30RBbDQVYeP98K4eW/6pUaLSKMsGhFXWVyaTAW 2PIYdFPvh/lyR3ZzkG44MUcgNN49gFV5gd3i+ShRnYaDOWVs777khU8CnRlCziPg ZVptG1ZDDoTTkVKoOnA91S25R0xfEwmFFQVjdE8qeZAy/Wf71LoT5pUfeabGM9AP hf3xCAZpGaGvdEWDoK/2fmloclRh8MkyEdVAzeDEIA2Eznp04rPuf3WxTfbIuwZ+ TUppPuvjEeItR6FXEkKveQjHOqG60V3OvGhcmG0TjxTiRCylRX5qYwEpgOaWnsgf abs6y26vGopAHEM0OrMeBLHPQThWX8y94aCIsRCBAgO1SDIleGE= =YydA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
