Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:07 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> > Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing?
> 
> To ensure arch's match between subpkgs.
> 
> > DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package for any 32bit package
> > in
> > transaction. So it is not possible to get 32bit package without
> > 64bit
> > counterpart.
> 
> I can 
> dnf install <foo>.i686
> 
> and I see no 64bit packages pulled in.
> 
> > So then what's the reason of using %{?_isa}? Just some old cruft
> > from yum
> > era? Can we drop it? Thoughts?
> 
> See above, imo, no, not wise to drop it.

+1 for multilib packages is important 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux