RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello,

Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing?

DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package for any 32bit package in
transaction. So it is not possible to get 32bit package without 64bit
counterpart.

So then what's the reason of using %{?_isa}? Just some old cruft from yum era?
Can we drop it? Thoughts?
- -- 
- -Igor Gnatenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Vudn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux