Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing?
>
> DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package for any 32bit package in
> transaction. So it is not possible to get 32bit package without 64bit
> counterpart.
>
> So then what's the reason of using %{?_isa}? Just some old cruft from yum era?
> Can we drop it? Thoughts?

Actually, libsolv doesn't quite do this all the time in every case.
There were a few fixes to libsolv post 0.6.30 for handling more
conditions of it.

It also avoids weird situations where you get arch switching with
package splits and obsoletes...

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux