Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Igor Gnatenko wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256

> 
> Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing?

To ensure arch's match between subpkgs.

> DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package for any 32bit package in
> transaction. So it is not possible to get 32bit package without 64bit
> counterpart.

I can 
dnf install <foo>.i686

and I see no 64bit packages pulled in.

> So then what's the reason of using %{?_isa}? Just some old cruft from yum
> era? Can we drop it? Thoughts?

See above, imo, no, not wise to drop it.

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux