On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 02:31 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:04:31AM -0500, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > Yep - basically, there will be no "old" and "new, DBUS/modular" > > > Anaconda, the plan is to turn the current Anaconda to the new one one > > > step at a time. > > > > > > This should allow us to fix bugs as usual and handle any unforeseen > > > modularization issues early on one-by-one as they show up. > > > > It sounds like there actually isn't a contingency plan as such. Do you > > think that this could all be reverted on Final Freeze day if we would > > decide it's not working out? If not, let's not call that a contingency. > > I would argue this isn't a "Self Contained Change" but a system wide > one. If anaconda is broken we can't even compose so this should all be > landed and complete by the time the system wide features need to be. Yeah, good point. I'd agree this should be considered system-wide, not self-contained. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
