On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tunek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2018-01-08 19:03 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 12:53 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> On 8 January 2018 at 12:28, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> > > A significant miss here is 'testing'. Making an arch primary >>> > > means we >>> > > need to ensure we have the necessary resources to run all the >>> > > relevant >>> > > validation testing. >>> > >>> > Are there hardware needs here? (Like, not in the server room but in >>> > QA >>> > team member's hands?) >>> > >>> >>> I would say in both. We would need to make sure we have enough >>> systems >>> which openqa can reliably run on and we need to have some sort of >>> system that testers can get a hand on. That would require a bit of a >>> 'we expect this hardware to work and this is how you buy/get it' from >>> the aarch64 team.. otherwise most everyone is going to come and ask >>> why the raspberry pi 3 isn't supported (just like they did with the >>> raspberry pi 1 and 2.) [I am not looking to rehash why it isn't .. >>> more that is what most testers can get their hands on easily.. and it >>> is not a aarch64 platform we support). >> >> I may be going off in the weeds here, but is https://fedoraproject.org/ >> wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_3_aarch64_support not >> accurate when it says it *is* supported? >> > > That link does not work for me and I get some strange redirect to the > Fedora download page. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
