On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 12:53 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 8 January 2018 at 12:28, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:16:05AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > A significant miss here is 'testing'. Making an arch primary >> > > means we >> > > need to ensure we have the necessary resources to run all the >> > > relevant >> > > validation testing. >> > >> > Are there hardware needs here? (Like, not in the server room but in >> > QA >> > team member's hands?) >> > >> >> I would say in both. We would need to make sure we have enough >> systems >> which openqa can reliably run on and we need to have some sort of >> system that testers can get a hand on. That would require a bit of a >> 'we expect this hardware to work and this is how you buy/get it' from >> the aarch64 team.. otherwise most everyone is going to come and ask >> why the raspberry pi 3 isn't supported (just like they did with the >> raspberry pi 1 and 2.) [I am not looking to rehash why it isn't .. >> more that is what most testers can get their hands on easily.. and it >> is not a aarch64 platform we support). > > I may be going off in the weeds here, but is https://fedoraproject.org/ > wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_3_aarch64_support not > accurate when it says it *is* supported? Nope, it's completely accurate and it's supported.... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
