Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Anaconda modularization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:04:31AM -0500, Martin Kolman wrote:
> Yep - basically, there will be no "old" and "new, DBUS/modular"
> Anaconda, the plan is to turn the current Anaconda to the new one one
> step at a time.
> 
> This should allow us to fix bugs as usual and handle any unforeseen
> modularization issues early on one-by-one as they show up.

It sounds like there actually isn't a contingency plan as such. Do you
think that this could all be reverted on Final Freeze day if we would
decide it's not working out? If not, let's not call that a contingency.

I'm not saying we shouldn't do this, but let's be honest with
ourselves. If the contingency plan is "None: we'll have to hold up the
release for fixes if it's not ready", the Change plan should say that.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux