On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 07:24:19AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:16:58AM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:21:08AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > this is already wrong. The "athlon" hack is *WRONG*. Athlon is a > > > marketing name, it could just as well be a duron or a sempron. > > > It was a mistake to put the athlon hack in uname (but hindsight is > > > easy); it's imo very wrong to repeat that mistake. > > > > Should I take it out? > > hard dilemma in that it risks breaking existing stuff.... but if it wasn't > for that I'd say yes. It's not as if that would be the first time that stuff is broken by depending on a bug. If the hack is incorrect, then let it be taken out and broken applications corrected. Regards, Luciano Rocha -- 4/11
