On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:21:08AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > this is already wrong. The "athlon" hack is *WRONG*. Athlon is a > marketing name, it could just as well be a duron or a sempron. > It was a mistake to put the athlon hack in uname (but hindsight is > easy); it's imo very wrong to repeat that mistake. Should I take it out? Tim. */
Attachment:
pgpD5HqAaFGmr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
