On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:16:58AM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:21:08AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > this is already wrong. The "athlon" hack is *WRONG*. Athlon is a > > marketing name, it could just as well be a duron or a sempron. > > It was a mistake to put the athlon hack in uname (but hindsight is > > easy); it's imo very wrong to repeat that mistake. > > Should I take it out? hard dilemma in that it risks breaking existing stuff.... but if it wasn't for that I'd say yes.
