On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:58:19PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> The mismatch in the numbering here feels inherently confusing to me. >> >> How about if the numbers were aligned, and then the first Beta target date >> was called something like "Preferred Beta Target" or "Beta Target 0"? >> >> That would give: >> >> * Beta Target 0 (preferred): missing this shortens the Beta testing >> period, but doesn't necessarily cause the Final release to slip >> * Beta Target 1: missing this means Final Target 2 is the earliest >> release date that will be considered >> * Beta Target 2: missing this means defining new Beta Target 3 and >> Final Target 3 dates >> * Final Target 1: releasing on this date requires hitting Beta Target 0 >> or Beta Target 1 >> * Final Target 2: fallback release target if Beta Target 1 and/or Final >> Target 1 are missed > > Sure, that works for me. I also appreciate your sneaking in the word > "preferred" there, because otherwise "Target 0" sounds like "We know > this'll never happen". :) Thanks Nick, the idea is now implemented in the draft of the policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle Jan > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
