On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:58:19PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > The mismatch in the numbering here feels inherently confusing to me. > > How about if the numbers were aligned, and then the first Beta target date > was called something like "Preferred Beta Target" or "Beta Target 0"? > > That would give: > > * Beta Target 0 (preferred): missing this shortens the Beta testing > period, but doesn't necessarily cause the Final release to slip > * Beta Target 1: missing this means Final Target 2 is the earliest > release date that will be considered > * Beta Target 2: missing this means defining new Beta Target 3 and > Final Target 3 dates > * Final Target 1: releasing on this date requires hitting Beta Target 0 > or Beta Target 1 > * Final Target 2: fallback release target if Beta Target 1 and/or Final > Target 1 are missed Sure, that works for me. I also appreciate your sneaking in the word "preferred" there, because otherwise "Target 0" sounds like "We know this'll never happen". :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
