On 11/10/2017 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: ...snip... > > On a bigger note: Do we really want to have a window after branch where > Bodhi isn't active? Might it be better to put that as part of the > Branch step? I don't think we want a longer freeze period (especially > during beta) but we You got cut off there? The reason in the past for the window after branching, but before bodhi enablement was because it allowed for a small window to fix up fallout from branching, but if everyone is ok with just doing it at the same time I suppose it should be possible. > And, on a even bigger note, the F27 July-to-October experiment worked > reasonably well (with the large remainer of the still-outstanding > Modular Server) but I don't think we want to do that again. I'd like to > suggest that if the April/May release slips into July, or the > October/November release slips into January, we *automatically* skip > the next target date for a _longer_ cycle to bring us back to schedule > rather than a short one. Sounds somewhat reasonable, but might get us behind on 'first' kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
