On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And, on a even bigger note, the F27 July-to-October experiment worked
reasonably well (with the large remainer of the still-outstanding
Modular Server) but I don't think we want to do that again. I'd like
to suggest that if the April/May release slips into July, or the
October/November release slips into January, we *automatically* skip
the next target date for a _longer_ cycle to bring us back to
schedule rather than a short one.
I thought it worked quite well. If a release gets delayed to July and
we completely skip the October release, so that the next release is in
April/May, then we need to be willing to push out major version
upgrades to the current stable release, and accept any accompanying
breakage. And that really blows up the entire concept of having stable
releases. A 10 month release cycle seems like a much bigger change to
me than a four month cycle. Fedora can't be a year behind and remain
relevant.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
