On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox (trademarks), > > and for bootloaders (signing again), and some packages which don't consider > > the fedora repo the canonical location for sources. > > > > Hold the phone! When did we allow packages to not consider the Fedora > Dist-Git the canonical location for sources? For fedora-release the idea is that "upsteam" has a copy of the spec file, and the changes are supposed to be copied both ways. But I think there's no disagreement with retiring "upstream", so this issue should be moot soon (independently of the other stuff being discussed). > As far as I know, this is > explicitly forbidden[1]. If there are any packages protected for that > reason, their protections should be absolutely stripped. > > [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Maintenance_and_Canonicity Yeah, but that's a longer conversation for another thread. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
