Re: streamlining fedora-release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox (trademarks),
> and for bootloaders (signing again), and some packages which don't consider
> the fedora repo the canonical location for sources.
>

Hold the phone! When did we allow packages to not consider the Fedora
Dist-Git the canonical location for sources? As far as I know, this is
explicitly forbidden[1]. If there are any packages protected for that
reason, their protections should be absolutely stripped.

[1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Maintenance_and_Canonicity


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux