I have many questions here.
Isn't this going to require relicensing a humongous number of
applications? We can't plausibly relicense so much. We would have to
remove printing support from GTK+, which is not going to happen.
The system library exception might work for Fedora, but it would be
unfair for us to accept a solution that likely won't work for our other
friends in the free software ecosystem.
Any idea why upstream seems to think we don't have to follow the
license if we use dynamic linking? It seems unlikely that this is
accurate, right?
Can upstream be persuaded to go with a BSD or MIT style license
instead, to avoid causing unnecessary problems for the free software
community?
Do we need to fork CUPS now?
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
