Re: x86_64 in FC4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gene C. <czar@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes, I have an Opteron system also and have been impressed with its relative 
> performance (even with my Opteron 140).

Indeed.  I have a single Opteron 3400 that is cranking a measured 1.65
times better performance than my previous machine on doclifter, my
monster Python app -- which doesn't sound impressive until you
consider that the previous machine was a 2-processor SMP with 1.8GHz
Athlons.  So my real-world throughput is as good or (allowing for
Amdahl's Law inefficiencies) better than what I'd get from a 6 GHz
Athlon, if such a thing existed.
 
>        The folks behind Fedora Core are trying to pick architectures 
> for which there are a large number of potential users. Thus, you have i386 
> (i586 and i686), x86_64, and (maybe) the ppc.

That should do it.  I expect the PPC to rise in importance rapidly over the
next two years, but I don't see anything other than x86_32, x86_64 and PPC
achieving significant market share.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux