Re: x86_64 in FC4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 04 February 2005 17:42, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I'm not yet sure whether we'll have PowerPC included - it would help to
> > have someone from that team give a summary of the status of rawhide on
> > that arch.
>
> I just got an Opteron box.  It would be real nice if the FC4 test 1 disks
> included 64-bit kernel RPMS and a handful of 64-bit builds for the most
> speed-critical stuff (Perl & Python interpreters, Open Office, etc.).

Yes, I have an Opteron system also and have been impressed with its relative 
performance (even with my Opteron 140).

For FC2 and FC3, the x86_64 has been a fully "tier 1" "supported" architecture 
and I would expect this to continue with FC4 [FC1 was also supported but just 
a bit later].  The folks behind Fedora Core are trying to pick architectures 
for which there are a large number of potential users. Thus, you have i386 
(i586 and i686), x86_64, and (maybe) the ppc.  For x86_64, almost all of the 
packages are built as x86_64 (not just the kernel and a few other packages).  
Included are some i386 packages since the system supports dual mode running 
of  32 bit or 64 bit applications and there are a few applications (notably 
openoffice.org) that are still 32 bit only.
-- 
Gene


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux