Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:39 PM, William Moreno
<williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 2017-10-26 15:02 GMT-06:00 Mátyás Selmeci <mselmeci.ml@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For upstream projects that provide spec files in their repositories, do
>> y'all tend to see a common location for the spec files? Like
>> dist/<name>.spec or rpm/<name>.spec, etc. My organization is trying to
>> standardize on a location for the software we maintain, and it would be
>> better to use something that many in the open source community also use.
>>
>
> Helllo I have not seem many upstream projects shiping rpm files in theirs
> sources, but I have seem  many with a /debian directory with all the debian
> packaging stuff and some others with a /PKGBUILD dwith file used for the
> Arch Linux´s AUR, since rpm is not only for Fedora I think /rpm should be a
> good place to ship the rpm file.
>
>

I've seen packaging/{debian,rpm}, packaging/, dist/, rpm/, as well as
it being a top-level file.

The projects I've worked on typically use dist/<package>.spec.

For example: https://github.com/datto/dattobd/blob/master/dist/dattobd.spec

Projects from SUSE typically use package/<package>.spec

For example: https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/blob/master/package/libsolv.spec.in

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux