Wrong. The Code of Conduct applies to all participation in Fedora. As I understand the history, your messages are on moderation because ... well, you keep doing this. That's not okay. If you had sent this just to me privately as a way of blowing off steam, I might try to personally talk you down. That's okay sometimes; everyone gets frustrated. But, anticipation that your message will be rejected by a moderator is no excuse. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:59:55PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > since my mails to the devel list are rejcted anyways the code of > conduct no longer applies to me > > Am 12.10.2017 um 15:51 schrieb Matthew Miller: > > > >Harald, you've had plenty of warnings. When you go off like this, it > >stops the conversation from being about the policies and problems. > >Don't do that. It is not productive or constructive. At the very, very > >minimum, it is a terrible way to get the results you want. But it is > >also against the Fedora Code of Conduct, which you must abide by when > >participating in Fedora. > > > >I know there is other stuff going on in that thread, but that is long > >and this is in my personal inbox, so it's getting first attention. > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:33:21AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >>IT IS NOT because the maintainer acts like a moron > >> > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500806#c13 > >> > >> > >>--- Comment #13 from Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > >>Sorry but the update stays there unless there's a general agreement > >>it should > >>be removed. If you feel so please file FESCo ticket for that. > >> > >>i slowly get tired enough to disable updates-testing at all and do > >>what you want guys in the future, have fun without testers which > >>means you maintainers need to do more quality work alltogether when > >>you lose your last resort between build something and the big > >>userbase > >> > >>Am 12.10.2017 um 02:36 schrieb Adam Williamson: > >>>On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:13 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm surprised that people use updates-testing for stable/production > >>>>>machines, have problem with handling the update and act like newbies. If > >>>>>you can't handle that, don't use that. Fedora is really a bleeding edge so > >>>>>don't complain you get new software with new features - even as testing > >>>>>only :) > >>>>> > >>>>>Where is Matthew Miller when you need him? No one said anything about > >>>> > >>>>using updates-testing for stable/productioin machines. And the fact that > >>>>you're implying that Fedora itself is bleeding edge and not really suited > >>>>for production raises a huge red flag. > >>>> > >>>>i have no doubt when this whole situation is reviewed logical minds will > >>>>prevail, but in the meantime you've taken advantage of a loophole. > >>>>Congratulations. > >>> > >>>I think you're getting a bit needlessly confrontational at this point. > >>>The issue's been sufficiently well raised now. Let's try to move > >>>forward productively from here... > -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
