On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > Although personally I have no specific objections and indeed plan to use > the IP accounting stuff on a bunch of units... since we're already past > beta, this is a critical component of the system and it's not got a Change > on the wiki for F27 I'd suggest that you need to raise your case with FESCo > for approval of doing this. Well, my point is that in this case there aren't any big changes, only some relatively minor feature additions. According to the policy, "minor" upgrades are OK after beta. The only difference for critical path packages is some additional karma requirements. The formal side is pretty clear. Instead, I'm giving the heads up in case any technical issues or regressions crop up. I'm especially interested in feedback from people who run rawhide, especially if they use various container technologies, namespaces, and such, which is probably the area most like to regress. In addition, it's possible that the fixes that are present in v235 could break some use cases. AFAIK, we didn't change documented behaviour, but rather clarified various gray areas, but I'm well aware that upstream developers test systemd only in narrow fraction of ways it is used in the wild. Hence this thread. Sorry, I should have made that clearer in my original e-mail. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
