Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> More news.
>
>   https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1330
>
> Upstream came up with a different fix.  It's slower since every
> reference (even within compilation units) now goes through the GOT,
> but it's likely to be safer and it's the one they went with for the
> future 4.06 release.
>
> Therefore I have added this fix instead of mine to
> ocaml-4.05.0-4.fc{27,28}.  I tested it first by rebuilding coq,
> frama-c and a selection of other packages using the new compiler on my
> local aarch64 machine and I didn't find any problems.
>
> There is no action required, unless you wish to check that the new
> compiler can still build your package.

Thanks for the information, Richard.  Meanwhile, I did successfully
build the new version of frama-c, but the poppler update that went
into Rawhide and the subsequent failure of texlive to build on 32-bit
arches happened at about the same time, so I have not been able to
build the new version of why yet.  Here's hoping the texlive problems
can be resolved soon.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux