Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nearly done it.  Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream
> version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that
> will require updating ‘frama-c’:
>
>   configure: WARNING: bad Frama-c version "Silicon-20161101", you need version Phosphorus
>
> At that point I stopped.  Would you mind updating and rebuilding
> ‘frama-c’ and ‘why’ in both Rawhide and F27?

Yep.  That's why, earlier in this thread, I said:

BTW, most of the packages that sit on top of coq have new versions
available, so when this is fixed, I will want to update the other
packages anyway.  If you could let me know when a fix for this issue
is available, I will take care of building everything else.


I guess what I should have said was, "Don't rebuild anything that sits
on top of coq.  I'll take care of all of the builds since I have to do
some updates anyway."  Sorry for not being clearer.  I'll get those
updates done in the next day or two.  Thanks a lot for the aarch64 bug
fix.  I appreciate the work you put in on this.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux