Re: Splitting AppStream data into Workstation/Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 5.9.2017 v 08:31 Nicolas Chauvet napsal(a):
> 2017-09-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 4 September 2017 at 17:56, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It sounds like it would make more sense for createrepo_c to link to
>>> the AppStream builder library to handle AppStream metadata processing
>>> as part of the createrepo_c repodata generation, wouldn't it?
>> 100% agree. This does take some time currently (as we have to
>> decompress some files from the lzma archives) but this is currently
>> done using my AMD Athlon Neo Microserver with spinning rust drives.
>> Using something XEONy and SSDy it'd be orders of magnitude faster. Are
>> we sure that we're using createrepo_c for composes? I know we *used*
>> to be the old python one for some reason.
> As I understand, the problem with the decompression is that it fetches
> the payload.
> And if a rpm weight 100MB, it will downloads (RPMs are often stored on
> nfs, so network is involved) and decompress the whole 100MB (including
> the header, although this last might be uncompressed).
> On the opposite, storing information on the RPM header means grabbing
> only the first KB out of the whole RPM.
>
> As one can see, this might work for few RPMs, but this doesn't scale
> at all on a big whole repository with many arches, specially if the
> work from a previous appdata-builder run cannot be cached for a later
> updates.
>
> So I wonder if it would be possible to have a "second payload" with
> only the appdata (xml, imgs) that it would be possible to fetch along
> the header without having to get the rest of the RPM ?
> On the second tough, with the effort needed to extract this
> information out of the rpm, is it really worth to store them there in
> the first step ? Over storing an URL (for xml and/or imgs) in the RPM
> header ?
>
> Thx for correcting me where I'm wrong.
>

Just another idea reading this ... could we move the AppStream data into
subpackage?

Vít
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux