Re: radical suggestion for fc4 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 01 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 14:14 -0500, seth vidal a Ãcrit :
> > > And keeping the last 6 months or a year of them is fine.
> > > 
> > > but cmon - do we really need 7 yrs or more worth of changelogs IN the
> > > rpm?
> > 
> > Well, there are still people that to focused Raw Hide upgrades on
> > systems partially upgraded from RH 7.1 to 7.3
> > (not kidding at all, really)
> > 
> 
> And why exactly do we care about them for purposes of this dicussion?

Because they are real users. A few megs of cd space savings are not
sufficient to justify putting part of our users in deep s*t.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux