On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:01:57 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:37:29PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > Oh, no. *Bad* idea. It's an attack on the symptom, not the problem. > > No, it's a *good* idea IMO. Problem is it does't go all the way. > WTH are changelogs doing in .spec files?!? This is the job of the version > control system, not of packaging specifications. Uhm, they document package changes. Ever taken a look at rpm --query --changelog kernel | less ? > It probably comes from the (misguided) school of thought that includes > $Log$ in source files... No.
