Le mardi 01 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 12:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a Ãcrit : > I disagree. Adding %changelogs to specs is not any different from $Log$. > > Having an entry in an rpm-header containing the last change might be > useful for users being interested in the reason for a new rpm release, > but I fail to understand why having a full %changelog-history inside of > rpms or metadata files is useful. All that means is you never maintained a complex RH/FC system for a long period. rpm changelogs are the first line of defense to understand what the heck happened to hose a long-working system. On Raw Hide they are as vital as the admin coffee. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
