On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:07:48 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote: > > *ouch* Covering such a corner-case is of limited use, IMO. > > What other package tools would benefit from such a protection? > > > > It's corner case, but user is user. We could say same thing about udev, systemd, dnf... > Why these are protected? Who would want to remove it from the system, when they know > such operation will break system significantly? The protection has some purpose and > for me is not relevant, how much is possible, that someone would do that improbably > action. I saw many situations that were *impossible*, but user can do everything. So > the elementary set of packages should be protected. Many "elementary" packages are not protected, and their removal can break a system in various ways. Adding protections to Yum/DNF config gives a false sense of security. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
