On 18.8.2017 16:16, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote: > >>>>> $ rpm -q --whatrequires setup >>>>> rpcbind-0.2.4-7.rc2.fc26.x86_64 >>>>> shadow-utils-4.3.1-3.fc26.x86_64 >>>>> >> >> # dnf remove setup >> >> I am not talking about update, I am talking about situation that you can break completely >> your system by removing of packages, that should not be removable. The logic why someone >> would want to remove such packages it is not relevant here. You shouldn't be able to do that. >> That's the point. > > Do you want to protect packages also against removing them with "rpm"? > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Hmmm, is it possible? I thought that with rpm I am able to remove even protected packages. In addition, I am able to remove even packages without dependencies, so I don't see the point. rpm is low level tool. No, I am talking just about use of dnf which is high level tool for working with packages/modules. -- Petr Stodulka Core Services (In-place upgrades and migrations) IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
