Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:01:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Can't we make it a drop-in replacement for reference BLAS/LAPACK and ATLAS, 
> i.e., having symlinks or linker scripts pointing at least libblas.so and 
> liblapack.so to libopenblas.so.*, ideally also libblas.so.3 and 
> liblapack.so.3 so that no rebuilds are necessary and so that things using 
> dlopen and third-party binary blobs also use OpenBLAS?
> 
> The current situation where we have 3 different BLAS implementations and 
> where for most programs, depending on your setup, you get either the worst 
> one (reference BLAS) or a suboptimal one (ATLAS compiled for the baseline 
> architecture), but never the best one (OpenBLAS with runtime CPU detection), 
> is a mess.

This sounds like a good idea (and worthy of a Change). I hate to
suggest Alternatives but maybe it's appropriate here? 

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux