Re: openQA failures caused by arch mismatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 06:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi, folks! This is just a heads-up for anyone who's been watching the
> > openQA test results for an update, or something, and been confused.
> > 
> > A few days ago we added a new ppc64 openQA worker host box; ultimately
> 
> Out of curiosity, do you mean ppc64, ppc64le, or both?
> 
> If ppc64le isn't the main target for openQA, i'd strongly recommend
> switching to that.

I can't remember which arch we installed the host with, but it doesn't
actually matter much because all openQA tests run in VMs, and
apparently you can get native speed virt for both ppc64 and ppc64le no
matter which the host is running. At least, so I was told.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux