Re: Fedora, apps, and the Flatpak opportunity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 07:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Keep in mind that Ansible is also something small-scale admins
> don't use. It
> > only makes sense at all if you have at least 2 servers, and it is
> only
> > really worthwhile if you have several, mostly identical servers. If
> you have
> > just one server, or two or three servers with very different
> configuration
> > from each other, it's just not worth it. So the workflow you
> suggest
> > introduces an extra learning curve.
> 
> Actually I disagree with you, I know people that use ansible to
> manage
> their laptop config (IE a single device) so that if they rebuild it
> they can get all their configs back quickly.

I agree with Peter, and I'll add another reason why Ansible is still
useful even if you only manage one system with it: it's a nice way to
describe everything that is different about your server from a clean
install (as code in git, so you can also get history). I find it
helpful to be able to answer the question "what is customized on this
system?"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux