On 22/07/17 22:54, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate >>> user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as >>> an unprivileged user for repos that aren't enabled by default. >> I'm fine with a layered approach, *if* a repo db does not exist for >> root, then it's OK for a user copy to be downloaded, but how about one >> for all users to share rather than each user getting a downloaded copy >> of the same thing? > > How? Setuid downloader? Or make it world-writable? Seems sketchy. > >>> Hmmmm. The `dnf -C` (or --cacheonly) flag does not seem to work as >>> documented. It says: > [...] >> Yep I've hit this also. > > Once this is fixed, I'm going to `alias dnf='dnf -c'` in my own user > account. Careful there. '-c', lowercase, specifies the config file. Make sure it's the uppercase '-C'. (On barely tangential note, dang, I miss yum aliases capability.) -- J. Randall Owens | http://www.GhiaPet.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
