On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate > > user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as > > an unprivileged user for repos that aren't enabled by default. > I'm fine with a layered approach, *if* a repo db does not exist for > root, then it's OK for a user copy to be downloaded, but how about one > for all users to share rather than each user getting a downloaded copy > of the same thing? How? Setuid downloader? Or make it world-writable? Seems sketchy. > > Hmmmm. The `dnf -C` (or --cacheonly) flag does not seem to work as > > documented. It says: [...] > Yep I've hit this also. Once this is fixed, I'm going to `alias dnf='dnf -c'` in my own user account. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
