On 07/16/2017 01:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Christian Schaller wrote: >> One major reason is that it enables us to move towards having the Atomic >> Workstation version be the primary one and maybe in the (very) long run be >> the only one. >> >> A bit more detail about that can be found here: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation > And how is that a worthwhile goal to begin with? I see only disadvantages in > the Atomic model. No more fine-grained choice of packages, just a "take it > or leave it" blob. No more possibility to add additional repositories > replacing individual packages (in fact, it contradicts the modularity idea > that is also being planned). And to work around that, you force all > applications to be delivered as their own monolithic blobs duplicating all > the libraries that are already in the OS blob (either as part of a "Runtime" > or as part of the app itself). > > I do NOT want an Atomic blob as my operating system. If Fedora forces its > users to use that, I will not use Fedora anymore. > > Kevin Kofler I completely agree with you, sounds like we lose flexibility and make things much more complicated as they should be. Greetings, Christian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
