Christian Schaller wrote: > One major reason is that it enables us to move towards having the Atomic > Workstation version be the primary one and maybe in the (very) long run be > the only one. > > A bit more detail about that can be found here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation And how is that a worthwhile goal to begin with? I see only disadvantages in the Atomic model. No more fine-grained choice of packages, just a "take it or leave it" blob. No more possibility to add additional repositories replacing individual packages (in fact, it contradicts the modularity idea that is also being planned). And to work around that, you force all applications to be delivered as their own monolithic blobs duplicating all the libraries that are already in the OS blob (either as part of a "Runtime" or as part of the app itself). I do NOT want an Atomic blob as my operating system. If Fedora forces its users to use that, I will not use Fedora anymore. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
