Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 19:30:18 +0100
Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How could that work? The runtime gets mounted in /usr and the app gets
> mounted in /app in a different place.
> https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/flatpak/latest/flatpak.pdf is a good
> read.

I just read that.  I'm ignorant of flatpak except for seeing it
mentioned here and reading that.  I have a ton of questions about
how this is going to work, and a lot of misgivings, but I'll just
lurk for most of them, as they are questions that are going to have
to be answered in the course of development.  One I would like
answered, though, is what would be the difference in size for a binary
rpm of, say, gedit and a flatpak of gedit?  It sounds like a flatpak is
many times larger than a binary rpm.  Is that true?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux