On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of > > their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM > > packaging. > > At least we see where this is going. > > If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is > the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one > of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging. Huh? How would you get sandboxing without Flatpaks? Unless you are proposing a different sandboxing technology. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx