Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >  F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> >       their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> >       packaging.
> 
> At least we see where this is going.
> 
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks?  Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.

Huh? How would you get sandboxing without Flatpaks? Unless you are
proposing a different sandboxing technology.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux