Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
+1, completely!
I think it is completely unacceptable to REPLACE RPMs with Flatpaks, and
this is exactly why I am so much opposed to this innocuous-sounding change
proposal that is just the beginning of the slippery slope.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
