On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >>> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> We want to make the default installation do the right thing, as far >>>> as >>>> possible, on any system, without any explicit configuration or >>>> admin steps. >>>> In this case it's possible: if a virtualization "channel" is >>>> configured, >>>> we should assume that the user wants the service. This means that >>>> the >>>> "guest additions" rpms should be a) installed by default, b) >>>> enabled >>>> when installed, c) work ootb when running in the right >>>> virtualization >>>> and silently do nothing otherwise. >>>> Essentially, I want to take the same image and boot it in >>>> virtualbox, >>>> kvm, on bare metal, and in a container, and have things just work. >>> >>> >>> Good luck with that. Since the Virtualbox guest additions are *not* >>> RPM enabled from their installation CD images, RPM is likely to >>> interfere with working, more recent installations of VBox drivers >>> from >>> the "Guiest Additions" iso image, unless great caution is employed >>> and >>> unless someone can convince them to be completely consistent in >>> installation tools, or to gracefully allow older and newer verson on >>> the same host. >> >> >> yes, we need install VirtualBox-guest-additions , which means >> VirtualBox will be one Fedora Package and BTW I hope that Fedora use >> RPMFusion package or based on that, I have many work there. >> And there [1] we got vboxservice.service which have >> ConditionVirtualization=|oracle > > No worries I do plan to use your package as a starting point and > I will coordinate with you. For now I'm focussed on cleaning up the > kernel module stuff though. Do you expect this to be complete and upstream in time for F27? While the upstream work is on-going, are you proposing to add the drivers to the kernel package via a patch? The Change could read either way on that. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
