Re: super-drafty F28 and F29 schedules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On ti, 11 heinä 2017, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IMHO, if you absolutely want to stick to May/October dates, it may make
sense to skip a release date as was done with F21 and go for a 9-month
cycle. The schedule as it stands now either WILL slip, or almost all the
planned features WILL have to be punted (and F27 will be essentially
identical to F26).

We need a GNOME 3.26 release. I know it's a very short cycle, and accordingly there are probably going to be fewer features than usual. Having such a short cycle is not ideal, but I think it's better than releasing too far after GNOME again. The problem here is not the F27 schedule, it's that the F26 schedule was a month too far out, plus a month of delay on top of that.
One of goals for F27 is to complete OpenSSL migration for majority of a
base system. Unfortunately, with such an aggressive schedule it is
guaranteed to be a failure in OpenSSL migration.

--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux