* Stephen John Smoogen: > On 11 July 2017 at 07:52, Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:41:05AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> And we do use SQLite today in DNF with the yumdb, as well as the new >>> SWDB coming soon(TM). I'm not sure why the SQLite backend was removed >>> in rpm 4.9.0, but maybe it should be revisited for rpm 4.14. >> >> AFAIR it was removed because it was unbearable slow, nobody used it, >> and nobody wanted to maintain it. >> > > 1. It was very slow.. and developers complained a lot about how long > it took to get various things done. It looks like the backend was ported from SQLite 2 code initially. The result set processing code indeed loks quite inefficient (result set cells are are allocated individually, memcpy is used to copy an int, and so on). But I'm still surprised this was observable to users. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
