Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:38:32PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 02:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do
> > to get ready for the mass rebuild in time.
> 
> I discussed this with Carlos, and we came up with this:
> 
> On POWER, the transition to the float128 format for the long double type
> did not happen upstream in time for the glibc 2.26 release.  This
> transition was the reasons why we requested the mass rebuild.

> If no other reason for a mass rebuild has surfaced, then we should
> just skip the mass rebuild for the Fedora 27 release.
Hm, https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6853 is about Go piggy-backing on
the "normal" mass rebuild.

> My concern is that the mass rebuild will reveal a substantial number of
> issues on POWER, and we'd have to look at each one individually to see
> if it is the known IFUNC resolver breakage.
Yeah, the schedule for F27 is very tight, things will be hard.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux