Is there any link to some docs on this and the reasons etc, every time I see a reference or message to this, there is no docs to refer to. On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 19:51 +0000, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > > I have gone ahead and filed a bug for this (Bug ID: 1468029) and > > proposed it as final blocker as we are so close to Final release of > > Fedora 26 and this definitely seems like a blocker to me. A working > > Wayland session is a requirement for final release if I am not > > wrong. > > In fact it isn't, the requirements are functional, not linked to > implementation details: we require that graphical installs boot to a > working desktop, we don't get into the details of what the display > server should be. > > In any case, I rather doubt this is a general issue. I rebooted this > system 8 days ago and it's certainly running Wayland. I just booted > up > the RC-1.4 Workstation live in a VM, and it's running Wayland. > > There are some specific hardware configurations on which the Wayland > session will *intentionally* downgrade to X, and when the Wayland > session fails to start correctly, it will automatically retry with an > X > session; you might be running into one of these cases. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . > net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
