Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:37:00PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I was under the impression that everything in Fedora was MIT licensed
> > unless otherwise specified as per:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement
> > Is that incorrect?
> That's enforced through the FPCA. If we accept contributions without
> the FPCA or making sure each spec file has the appropriate license
> header, that could be quite problematic...

>From what I understand from Richard Fontana, we could probably
accomplish this with a statement somewhere, rather than requiring an
explicit account agreement.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux