On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git) > > I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need > for FPCA. Maybe this is an opportunity to move in that direction? I > know Spot has said that "License In = License Out" is adequate for > projects on Github; I think Spot's concern with spec files is that we > don't give them an explicit license (right)? > I was under the impression that everything in Fedora was MIT licensed unless otherwise specified as per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement Is that incorrect? -AdamM > As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so > the FPCA isn't needed here? > > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
